Three Members of Black Sabbath Said Yes to a Final Album. All Three Said Yes to the Same Man.

Foto: Fatih Renkligil — CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Three Members of Black Sabbath Said Yes to a Final Album. All Three Said Yes to the Same Man.

Andrew Watt phoned the original lineup one at a time and collected three conditional yeses, every one of them hanging off Bill Ward. Four weeks earlier, Tony Iommi had told a different version of the same story.

The chain of yeses

Andrew Watt, the producer who made Ozzy Osbourne’s last two solo records, was sent to do the phone work on a final Black Sabbath album. One member at a time, at Sharon and Ozzy’s request.

He called Tony Iommi first. Watt’s account, on the Lipps Service podcast on 8 October 2026: “So I called Tony to talk to him and he said he was into it as long as Bill was there.”

Then Ozzy. “Ozzy was like, ‘If Bill does it, we’ll do it.’”

Then Geezer Butler. “Geezer said, ‘If the other guys are in, I’m in to do it.’”

Three yeses. Read them as a list and they look like consensus. Read them as a circuit and they are something else: nobody committed to the record. Each one committed to a condition, and all three conditions pointed at the same node.

That node was Bill Ward, the drummer the band had already recorded an album without.

Forty minutes, then an email

Watt made the call. “I had this 40-minute call with Bill, which was one of the weirdest and funniest phone calls just ever,” he said. He came off it believing Ward “was not going to be able to make the record,” and he has since added that the reasons were multiple.

Note the wording, because the headlines have been flattening it. Watt does not say Ward refused. He says Ward was not going to be able to do it. Those are different stories about a man, and only one of them is in the source.

Then: “Bill sent us all this long email, and then it was over.”

Nobody has published the email, its date, or a line from it. Watt says only that it was long and that the reasons were multiple. Everything else people have written about what Ward’s email said is somebody filling in a blank.

Why the chain ran through Ward in the first place

Why would three men in their seventies make a reunion record contingent on the one member the band had carried on without a decade earlier?

Go back to February 2012. The original four had announced a reunion album and a tour. Ward did not walk away from it. He published a statement saying the opposite: “I definitely want to play on the album, and I definitely want to tour with Black Sabbath.” What stopped him was paper. “I am unable to continue unless a ‘signable’ contract is drawn up; a contract that reflects some dignity and respect toward me,” he wrote, in a statement carried at the time by Stereoboard.

The band’s answer was to proceed. Their own announcement, reported by Blabbermouth, said they had “no choice but to continue recording without Bill Ward.” He formally pulled out of that year’s shows in May, as Pollstar reported on 15 May 2012.

So 13 came out in 2013 with Brad Wilk on drums. The last album the four original members made together is still Never Say Die!, from 1978.

Which makes the phone chain Watt describes a kind of correction. In 2012 the band decided the record could exist without Ward. Roughly a decade later, when the idea came back, all three of them put him first. Iommi’s yes had his name in it explicitly. Whatever happened in 2012, by the early 2020s the other three had concluded there was no final Black Sabbath album without the original drummer.

A dependency that runs through one person has no second route. One email finished the project.

Iommi got there first, and told it differently

Most coverage has collapsed the chronology. Watt spoke on 8 October 2026. Four weeks earlier, in September, Iommi had already told Classic Rock his own version, carried on 12 September by Blabbermouth and MusicRadar. On Watt: “He was very keen and a bit too excited. He also didn’t know what it was like working with the original Sabbath, working with Bill.” And on the record itself: “We’d done ‘13’, and I didn’t like the idea of: ‘Now here’s another album.’”

So Iommi’s version has Iommi as the one who passed: a man who did not want another album and found the producer a bit much. Watt’s version, a month later, has Iommi saying yes on a condition.

I am not going to tell you which one is lying, because I do not think either is. A phone call from three or four years ago is not a transcript, and both accounts survive each other more easily than they look like they should: a cautious yes to a producer on the phone and a private reluctance about doing it at all can live in the same man. Both stories do have the same shape, though. Watt’s ends with Ward. Iommi’s ends with Iommi declining politely. Neither narrator is the one who closed the door.

So keep the dateline: Iommi in September, Watt in October. When the next person speaks, the story moves again, and whoever speaks last gets to set where the blame lands. Rock history gets written on the calendar of the interview cycle more often than anyone admits.

The stage door stayed open

The email killed the album. It did not kill the reunion.

On 5 July 2025, at Villa Park in Birmingham, the four original members of Black Sabbath played together for the first time in twenty years: “War Pigs,” “N.I.B.,” “Iron Man,” “Paranoid.” Four songs at the Back to the Beginning show, and Loudwire has the setlist.

Ozzy died seventeen days later, on 22 July 2025, aged 76, at home in Buckinghamshire, as Radio X reported at the time.

Whatever stood between Ward and that record, it did not stand between him and that stage. He sat down behind the kit and played the four songs. Watt’s phone chain says only that something made the album impossible for him: health, a contract, logistics, we do not know, and Watt confirms there was more than one reason. Villa Park says it was not an unwillingness to be in the room.

Ward’s post the day Ozzy died: “Where will I find you now? … Never goodbye. Thank you forever.” A year later, on the anniversary: “Every day, there is a persistent silence. We miss you so much.”

The thread to pull

Of the three who said yes, Geezer Butler is the one who has not given his version. Ward, who ended it, has never spoken about it publicly at all. The two accounts we have both come from men with a reason to be the one who did not refuse, and the only person who could settle it has stayed quiet since before Watt’s podcast went out.

There is a longer pattern here that this piece cannot prove. Ward has been the hinge on Black Sabbath reunions before, in arrangements going back decades, and 2012 and this phone chain rhyme in a way that suggests the drummer’s seat was where the band’s decisions actually got made. That needs its own research, and it is the next thing I want to dig into: how often, across fifty years, the whole operation waited on the man at the back.

If you have a view on whose version of that phone call you believe, Iommi’s or Watt’s, that argument is happening at @realrocklab on Threads.

Sources: Loudwire, 8 Oct 2026 · Louder, 8 Oct 2026 · Blabbermouth, 12 Sep 2026 · MusicRadar · Stereoboard, Feb 2012 · Blabbermouth, 2012 · Pollstar, 15 May 2012 · Loudwire: Villa Park setlist · Radio X, Jul 2025